 |
|
|
 |
|
Studies Show Fertility Rates Plummet Worldwide Following COVID-19 Vaccines
A presentation recently made by
Dr. Christof Plothe, a German Doctor of Osteopathy who is also a member of the World Council for Health, reveals the most startling evidence yet that COVID vaccines are causing massive cases of infertility,
not just among women, but men also. Combined with the record volume of deaths and disabilities among the COVID-19 vaccinated, the future implications of what this vaccine has done to the human population and labor pool, is almost unfathomable. This
information is NOT being reported in the corporate media, and to reference it is to be labeled as someone providing “disinformation” by most. The presentation was made on the Iron Will Report. I will embed the video below. Show notes: Highlights by Dr. Mark Trozzi: - Pregnancy last 9 months, yet these “vaccines” were approved in in just 108 days. How can any claim of safety in pregnancy be made? Normally vaccine approval takes ten years.
- Pregnant women were excluded from clinical trials, yet the injections were declared safe for pregnant women. Based therefore on nothing!
- 270 women did get pregnant during the Pfizer trial ; of those 238 were not reported, and only one normal birth
was reported.
- Polyethyleneglycol which is a component of the pegylated nanoparticle used to deliver the genetic material into the human cells was known to be a fetal toxin before since before covid was launched.
- Moderna and Pfizer-biotech
studies on 44 rats for just 42 days demonstrated a doubling of preimplantation loss of pregnancy, and 295% increased rate of birth defects. There was no evaluation of next generation effects, and the researchers were riddled with conflicts of interest that
they tried to hide.
- Fertility requires long term studies. These have not been done.
- By sept 2021 tens of thousands of menstrual problems in women were reported following the jabs, with heavy bleeding 8000 times normal!
- Japan study
of biodistribution showed extensive distribution with profound concentration in women’s ovaries.
- Potential mechanisms of fertility harm include pegylated nanoparticle toxicity, spike protein toxicity , immune response to SP , autoimmune attack
on SP producing ovaries, and immune attack on an essential reproductive protein syncytin-1 which is structurally similar to SP.
- Moderna “vaccine” uses a higher dose of 100 mcg than Pfizer’s 30 mcg dose. Pfizer stopped the higher
dose due to even higher toxicity, but moderna still uses it.
- The injected mRNA persists in most victims for 2 months, and stimulates spike protein production with SP persisting 15 months. SP damages male testes with dramatic reduction in spermatogenisis
- An Israel study showed sperm count and male fertility decreased with just one shot, then the study was ended. So what happens with repeat doses?
- USA VAERS reveals massive infertility issue reports, accounting for 95% of all infertility reports
in the 30 years of reporting for all vaccines combined.
- Around the world, wherever the “vaccines” are rolled out, birth rates drop dramatically nine months later. This is unprecedented, and includes Ireland, Germany, Australia, UK, Switzerland,
Sweden, Canada, Hungary and others.
- The most injected countries have the biggest drops in birth rates.
- In comparison with influenza vaccines, these injections have a 1500% higher associated miscarriage rate.
- Some studies show
polyethylene glycol causing next generation infertility. Perhaps injected people will have sterile children.
- We need long term controls, but drug companies injected the control subjects after the brief study periods, thus eliminating long term controls.
The closest thing we have is the countries where people have best resisted the forced injections.
- Stop the Vaccines. Stop suppressing ivermectin and promote safe covid treatment. Stop the persecution of the doctors who have been scientifically
and ethically correct from the beginning. These doctors must be exonerated and returned to serving the people who need us now more than ever.
- Dr Plothe explores the possibility of this genetic modification of humans to produce toxic viral spike
proteins, being inherited and the implications that may have for the children.
- Presentation ends at 24 min and Will’s questions start:
- Iron Will raises issues of malpractice, intention, misrepresentation, fraud, compromised journals,
persecuted good doctors, and the CDC hiding deaths having removed 50,000 deaths from the VAERS data base and reclassifying them.
- Unknowns include: will this genetic experiment result in inheritable poison SP production in humans? Will there be future
generations?
- Dr Plothe is seeing many covid “vaccine” damaged patients daily in his practice and he relates some of these experiences.
- Dr Plothe reminds us how science really works, and calls to end the suppression and have
open forums. “Lets go back to science; today, not tomorrow.”
Comment by Dr Trozzi: Thanks to Iron Will and Dr Plothe. The reality is tragic; but this interview and content is exceptional. There should be no
question about stopping these injections immediately, as well as investigating and prosecuting the many high profiting perpetrators and accomplices to unprecedented crimes against humanity. Imagine, even at this time, the Universities of Western Ontario
and Toronto are demanding that students be injected and subjected to this sterilization, or forfeit their education. Government officials who are mandating this are at war with innocent unsuspecting men, women, and children. Studies Show Fertility Rates Plummet Worldwide Following COVID-19 Vaccines – Era of Light
**By Brian Shilhavy **Source
Strålevernet innrømmer: har feilinformert om styrken på AMS-målerne
https://einarflydal.com/2018/05/03/stralevernet-innrommer-har-feilinformert-om-styrken-pa-ams-malerne/ Statens strålevern innrømmer nå at de har feilberegnet smartmålernes sendestyrke
i forhold til mobiltelefoner. Etaten har blandet målemetoder. I stedet for at sendestyrken fra målerne er mye svakere enn mobiltelefoner, slik Strålevernet hevdet, er den langt sterkere, slik EMF-Consult hevdet. Det tok et halvt års
tid å få ut den innrømmelsen, og den er pakket så godt inn at den er nesten usynlig. Men den er kommet – etter purring. NVE, nettselskapene og kundene er blitt feilinformert. Smartmålerne er installert på falske premisser.
Dette kan bidra til å forklare de mange historiene om akutte helseplager. Bakgrunnen Historien startet med at Strålevernet 21.08.2017 ga ut et «faktaark» om smartmålere der det ble hevdet
at strålingen var langt svakere enn fra mobiler og så sjelden at den ikke kunne utgjøre noe helseproblem. Og dessuten lå strålingen jo langt under grenseverdiene. På Facebook-siden het det: - Strålingen
fra de nye smarte strømmålerne som nå installeres i norske hus er så svak at det ikke er helsefarlig å få en slik hjemme. Det spiller ingen rolle hvor mange ganger i døgnet strømmåleren din sender data
til nettselskapet – strålingen er fortsatt svak. (http://bit.ly/2iv0Yqy)
Både jeg og andre har siden gang på gang pekt på at «faktaarket»
var fullt av feil. (Se f.eks. min bloggpost 24.08.2017, og se Hjortlands brev 25.08.2018 om kommentar på Facebook, som inngår i korrespondansen du finner vedlagt nedenfor): For bare
en meget liten del av kommunikasjonsmengden var jo tatt med i Strålevernets omtale: bare overføring av målerdata til netteier. Denne overføringen skjer bare hver time eller sjeldnere. Den øvrige kommunikasjonen,
som skal holde det lokale trådløse nettverket mellom målerne ved like og endre det hvis forbindelser blir brutt, er slett ikke så sjelden, men nærmest konstant, spesielt i innkjøringsperioden. For målere av merket
Aidon har signaleringen også etter innkjøring vært målt til hvert 0,6 sekund – døgnet rundt. Det betyr at vi ikke snakker om noen sjelden, men en konstant biologisk belastning. Så
gjaldt det signalstyrken: Slik Statens strålevern presenterte det både i sitt «faktaark» og ellers, var strålingen fra smartmålere angivelig svært svak – langt svakere enn fra mobiler og
svært langt under grenseverdiene. Både Hjortlands og min kritikk gikk ut på at grenseverdiene ikke er egnet til å fange opp de sider ved strålingen som skaper skade: Omfattende forskning dokumenterer – i
strid med Strålevernets «kunnskapsgrunnlag» – at helseplager og -skader oppstår akutt og på lang sikt ved langt svakere stråling. Ikke minst når strålingen er pulset, slik strålingen fra målerne
er. Den kritikken står fortsatt, og er ganske så omforent blant fagfolkene. Det er bare den snevre krets av næringstilknyttet og svak forskning som Strålevernet henger seg på, som forsvarer dagens grenseverdier og hevder at gjeldende
grenseverdier er et vettugt verktøy til å beskytte folkehelsa. Feil målemetode Men så kom både Odd Magne Hjortland og Jostein Ravndal, begge EMF Consult, litt seinere med en ganske
annen type skyts (video fra foredrag på FELO-konferansen, for brev til Statens strålevern 25.11.2017 se vedlegget): De påviste at Strålevernet
hadde oversett at strålingen fra målerne regnes ut etter en annen målemetode enn strålingen fra målerne (e.r.p. versus e.i.r.p.). Strålevernet hadde blandet sammen målemetoder slik at forskjellen ble sterkt overdrevet.
Rett regnet sender en AMS-måler slett ikke svakere, men vesentlig sterkere enn en mobiltelefon i 3G- eller 4G-modus. Faktisk tre ganger sterkere – målt i samme avstand fra kilden og når begge sender for full styrke.
Statens strålevern hadde også sammenliknet slik at forskjellen ble gunstigst mulig: Man hadde sammenliknet med GSM (altså 2G), som nå bare utgjør en uvesentlig del av trafikken (5%), men sender kraftigere enn 3G og 4G. Også
på den måten økte man forskjellen så AMS-målerens signaler skulle virke enda svakere i forhold. Såvel NVE, netteiere og kunder var altså blitt feilinformert – selv utfra gjeldende grenseverdier. Deres
vurderinger og aksepter er altså gjort på feil grunnlag. EMF-Consult ba naturlig nok Strålevernet om å rette opp feilen overfor NVE og nettselskapene, slik at også NVE og nettselskapene kan rette sin informasjon videre.
For hvordan skal nettselskapene og kundene vel ellers foreta informerte valg? I følgeskrivet (epostmelding samme dato) kopler EMF-Consult den sterkere strålingen til at så mange henvender seg med helseplager som først dukker
opp når målerne installeres: forklaringen synes å være strålingen. Derfor er dette akutt. Odd Magne Hjortland, EMF-Consult, møtte bare taushet, men ga seg ikke: han skrev også om saken til NVE 14.01.2018, med
kopier både til HOD og OED. Hva gjør så NVE? Jo, sender saken til Statens strålevern. HOD vet nok Så purret Hjortland etterhvert til NVE og Statens strålevern for manglende svar.
HOD svarer avvisende til tanken om det kanskje er behov for en ny kunnskapsgjennomgang (18/191-3, 15.02.2018). Det syntes åpenbart ikke HOD. Folkehelseavdelingen i HOD vet åpenbart nok – eller har kanskje den avdelingen for mye å
forsvare? Avdelingsdirektør Elin Anglevik har jo i alle år forsvart grenseverdiene og fortalt folk med de mest åpenbare tilfeller av akutt intoleranse for elektromagnetisk eksponering at slikt kan de ikke bli syke av, og hun har dessuten
familien i mikrobølgebransjen. Hennes bastante avvisninger har skapt stor forargelse og fortvilelse i mange år. I stedet for forsknings- og erfaringsbasert hjelp fra myndighetene henvises de til uførhet på vage diagnoser og enkelte
må flytte til skogs for å komme seg i skjermede miljøer der de kan fungere normalt. Innrømmelsen Så kom svaret fra Statens strålevern. Det dukket opp nylig hos EMF-Consult,
kan man lese ut av Strålevernets postjournal: I brev av 18. april (se vedlegget nederst) innrømmer Statens strålevern at EMF Consult har hatt rett hele tiden, men pakker det inn så godt at innrømmelsen er omtrent ugjennomtrengelig.
Man må nærmest være bibeltolker for å forstå det, men skreller man bort frasene forteller brevet at Strålevernet medgir omsider at de nye målerne ved maks signalstyrke sender nesten tredobbelt så kraftig
som 3G og 4G ved maks sendestyrke. Og det gjør de døgnet rundt, og langt oftere enn Strålevernet har gitt inntrykk av. Strålevernet forsøker så å hevde at i praksis betyr ikke forskjellen noe fordi
målinger i felt viser så store variasjoner. Det dekker ikke over at feilen ble gjort, og nedenfor ser vi at Strålevernets argument ikke holder: Også når de ikke går for full styrke, er signalene
fra målerne langt sterkere enn fra mobiler. Bildet under viser en sammenlikning som EMF-Consult har gjort mellom to mobiler uten trafikk, og to smartmålere i normal drift. Dette mønsteret er nok til å forklare at så mange klager
over plager som oppstår når målerne er installert – hva enten de visste at de kom eller ikke, og selv om de bruker mobil til daglig: målerne sender langt sterkere og langt oftere, også når man sover. Avstand til kildene
er her 3 meter. Mange har målerne langt tettere på hodeputa, og flere målere i nærheten. Fikenbladet til Statens strålevern er videre at strålingen uansett er så svak at feilene i regnestykkene og sammenlikningene ikke er vesentlige. Strålingen er uansett så lav i forhold til grenseverdiene.
Men også dette er direkte feil: en mobil holdt til hodet ligger tett opptil, eller over, de grenseverdiene som gjelder for slik eksponering. Står man tett ved et sikringsskap plassert i entreen (som hos meg og svært mange andre) og prater
med naboen, står man tett på måleren (eller antenna, som ofte er montert utenpå sikringsskapet), kanskje bare 10 cm ifra. Men enda viktigere er at grenseverdiene som nevnt er særdeles lite relevante, ettersom de 1) ikke
er formet med noen ambisjon om å beskytte mot andre skader enn akutte oppvarmingsskader, og 2) ikke regner med alle de andre skademekanismer som det er godt dokumentert har virkning ved langt svakere stråling. Opprydding
nødvendig Tilbaketoget bør være pinlig for etaten, og må selvsagt føre til at Strålevernet retter sin informasjon. Forskjellen er slett ikke uvesentlig. Den er tvert om meget vesentlig straks man skaffer
seg et annet kunnskapsgrunnlag enn Strålevernet og lytter til hva verdens fremste forskere på feltet forteller og advarer om. (Kilder til dette fins overalt i mine bloggposter.) Innrømmelsen må også føre til at
NVE og nettselskapene snarest korrigerer sin informasjon til landets strømkunder – også til alle de som har fått installert smartmålere på feil premisser. Hvem utførte egentlig regnestykkene til Statens strålevern?
Var det NKOM? Strålevernets svar tyder på det. I så fall har både Statens strålevern og NKOM et problem. Var det et firma i smartmåler-bransjen, et nettselskap eller et konsulentselskap? I så fall har bransjen ikke
bare ett, men flere problem å rydde opp i. Statens strålevern vil imidlertid ikke rette opp, i følge brevet. Det bør den etaten ikke få lov til å unndra seg. Skjer det ikke raskt – på Strålevernets
nettsider og i skriv til NVE, HOD og Hdir og andre relevante – tror jeg at jeg sender klage til Sivilombudsmannen for forvaltningen over at Strålevernet er på ville veier og trekker både andre etater, nettselskaper, pressen og almenheten
med seg i dragsuget. Det bør andre også gjøre. Det fins bare fem mulige alternative betegnelser på det som Strålevernet her forsøker seg på: svindel, dumskap eller «cover your ass». Og de er ikke gjensidig
utelukkende. Korrespondansen kan du lese her: LANGSOM FERD MOT INNRØMMELSEN.
Einar Flydal, 3. mai 2018 PDF-versjon: EFlydal-20180503-
Strålevernet innrømmer men retter ikke-5 Kategorier: artikkel Stikkord: AMS, smartmåler, strålevern, stråling
98 million Americans were given polio vaccine contaminated with cancer-causing virus, admits CDC
http://www.naturalnews.com/041345_cdc_polio_vaccine_sv40.html (NaturalNews) The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
has once again been caught removing pertinent but indicting information about vaccines from its website. This time it involves the infamous polio vaccine, up to 98 million doses of which have been exposed as containing a cancer-causing virus that is now believed
to be responsible for causing millions of cancers in America, according to the CDC.
The information was posted on an official CDC fact sheet entitled Cancer, Simian Virus 40 (SV40), and Polio Vaccine, which
has since been removed from the CDC's website. Fortunately, RealFarmacy.com was able to archive the damning page before the CDC ultimately removed it, presumably because SV40 has been receiving considerable attention lately
due to its connection to causing cancer.
You can view the link to the original CDC page on SV40 and polio vaccines, which is no longer active, here:
http://www.cdc.gov
You can view the full archived CDC page here:
http://webcache.googleusercontent.com
As you will notice on the archived CDC page, the SV40 virus was allegedly first discovered in monkeys back in 1960, and not long after began appearing inexplicably in polio vaccines.
The SV40 virus, according to this same page, has been linked to causing a variety of human cancers, including childhood leukemia, lung cancer, bone cancer, and Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma.
Though the CDC denies
a definitive causal link between SV40 and cancer, it implies that the virus, which was supposedly removed from all polio vaccines in 1963, was problematic in relation to cancer development. More than 98 million people, in fact, may have been exposed to SV40 as a result of receiving government-recommended polio vaccines back in the 1960s, and many of these may have developed cancer as a result.
"More than 98 million Americans
received one or more doses of polio vaccine from 1955 to 1963 when a proportion of vaccine was contaminated with SV40," explains the CDC. "[I]t has been estimated that 10-30
million Americans could have received an SV40 contaminated dose of vaccine."
SV40 virus in polio vaccines linked to bone cancer, mesothelioma So why the sudden removal of this important information from the CDC's website?
The cached CDC page, as you will notice, makes sure to dissuade its readers from thinking that SV40 has been conclusively linked to causing cancer, even though it was demonstrated back
in 1961 by the National Institute of Health (NIH) that SV40 is directly linked to causing tumor formation.
"Like other polyomaviruses, SV40 is a DNA virus that has been found to cause tumors and cancer,"
explains RealFarmacy.com. "SV40 is believed to suppress the transcriptional properties of the tumor-suppressing genes in humans through the SV40 Large T-antigen and SV40 Small T-antigen. Mutated genes may contribute to uncontrolled
cellular proliferation, leading to cancer."
As far as specific conditions linked to SV40, Michele Carbone, Assistant Professor of Pathology at Loyola University in Chicago, found that the virus is present
in many cases of both osteosarcoma bone cancer and the increasingly prevalent lung cancer variety known as mesothelioma. As it turns out, Carbone identified SV40 in about one-third of all osteosarcoma cases studied, and in 40 percent of other bone cancers.
The same was true for 60 percent of all cases of mesothelioma.
"Many authorities now admit much, possibly most, of the world's cancers came from the Salk and Sabin polio vaccines,
and hepatitis B vaccines, produced in monkeys and chimps," adds RealFarmacy.com. "It is said (that) mesothelioma is a result of asbestos exposure, but research reveals that 50 percent of the current mesotheliomas being treated no
longer occur due to asbestos but rather the SV40 virus contained in polio vaccination."
Be sure to read the entire RealFarmacy.com report here:
http://www.realfarmacy.com
Sources for this article include:
http://www.realfarmacy.com
http://www.naturalnews.com
http://www.sv40foundation.org
http://www.science.naturalnews.com
Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/041345_CDC_polio_vaccine_SV40.html#ixzz3qMFLpqBy
Supreme Court Legislation Exempts Pharmaceutical Companies From Disclosing Risks Associated With Products
http://www.collective-evolution.com/2015/03/29/supreme-court-legislation-exempts-pharmaceutical-companies-from-disclosing-risks-associated-with-products/
“The learned intermediary doctrine is itself an exception to the manufacturer’s traditional duty to warn
consumers directly of the risks associated with any product.” (source) It’s called the “learned intermediary doctrine,” and
it’s important to drug manufactures because it allows them to avoid warning consumers directly about their products when it comes to the risks associated with their use. Instead, these warnings are (supposedly) given to the physician, who lends
their trust over to the corporation in the hopes that they are disclosing all information, who in turn is then responsible (the doctor) for relaying these risks to their patient. It takes all responsibility and liability (regarding risks associated with pharmaceutical
products like vaccines and prescription drugs) away from the drug manufacturer, and places it solely
on the physician. “Thus, prescription drug manufacturers’ duty to warn consumers flows through the patients’ prescribing physicians, not directly to consumers.” (source) This is a scary thought, given the fact that the education doctors receive regarding all medicines comes directly from the drug manufactures themselves. Most of the time, doctors are educated on how the drug works to heal
the patient and what biological processes take place with regards to the disease. In their own practices, some doctors accept the drugs without ever questioning their validity, giving complete trust over to the the pharmaceutical companies. Many doctors
often assume that these drugs have passed through government safety checks by, for example, the Food and Drug Administration. It is still not properly acknowledged that pharmaceutical companies have a hand in dictating governmental policy, or that there
are monetary incentives offered for dishonesty, especially when it comes to the health industry. This is not just conspiracy theory, there are countless examples that clearly show why we cannot trust pharmaceutical companies to properly relay information
regarding the risks associated with their products to doctors or to people who use their products and don’t require a doctor’s visit. I am talking about scientific fraud. “It is simply no longer possible to believe much
of the clinical research that is published, or to rely on the judgement of trusted physicians or authoritative medical guidelines. I take no pleasure in this conclusion, which I reached slowly and reluctantly over my two decades as an editor of the New England
Journal of Medicine” (considered to be one of the most prestigious peer-reviewed medical journals in the world). – Dr Marcia Angell, Physician, Author, Former Editor in Chief of the NEJM (source) Documents obtained by Lucija Tomljenovic, PhD, from the Neural Dynamics Research Group in the Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences at the University of British Columbia,ddd reveal that vaccine manufacturers, pharmaceutical
companies, and health authorities have known about multiple dangers associated with vaccines but chose to withhold them from the public. This is scientific fraud, and suggests that this practice continues today. (source) This is no secret. The list literally goes on and on, with many examples to choose from. And again, the law states that relaying the risks associated with these drugs are the doctors’ responsibility. “For
prescription drug manufacturers, the rationale behind the doctrine is based largely on the fact that prescription drugs’ actions are complex and the prescribing physician is the one best able to determine the drug’s potential benefits and risks
for a particular patient.” Humble Sand & Gravel, Inc. v. Gomez, 146 S.W.3d 170, 191 (Tex. 2004) (stating that the doctrine is based on the idea “that it is better for the patient for the warning to come from his or her physician”); Restatement
(Third) of Torts: Prods. Liab. § 6(d)(1) cmt. b (1998) (“The rationale supporting this ‘learned intermediary’ rule is that only health-care professionals are in a position to understand the significance of the risks involved
and to assess the relative advantages and disadvantages of a given form of prescription-based therapy.’)” (source) There are also exceptions to
this law, where pharmaceutical companies provide health products directly to the consumer. In this case, they do not have to go through a physician. Examples include contraceptive pills, vaccines, and more. “Modern realities have rendered
the learned intermediary doctrine obsolete because its application allows pharmaceutical manufacturers to escape their traditional duty to warn at the expense of consumer health and well-being.” (source) One example is the polio vaccine, where a (1968) court held that manufacturers of the polio vaccine had an obligation to warn patients directly of the fatal risks that are associated with vaccination. This is a great example
where there was little to no physician supervision (still common today) when it comes to mass immunization clinics. In this case, the learned intermediary doctrine was inapplicable to drugs being directly marketed to consumers. Reasons include:
- Informed consent requires a patient-based decision rather than the paternalistic approach of a bygone era
- Many of the drugs marketed directly to consumers are lifestyle drugs that are not medically necessary, so it is not the physician weighing
the risks and benefits but rather the patients
- Drug manufacturers are already spending billions on advertising to consumers, so it is clear that they have effective means of communicating with consumers.
Why
Are Pharmaceutical Companies Above The Law? Why Are They Constantly Exempt From Any Wrongdoing? What we are looking at here are measures put in place that completely protect pharmaceutical companies. Another great example is The National
Childhood Vaccine Injury Act. The mid-1970’s saw an increased focus on personal health, and accordingly, more people became concerned about vaccine safety. Several lawsuits were filed against vaccine manufacturers and healthcare providers
by people who believed they had been injured by vaccines, and the evidence presented in court was good enough to win. As a result, this act was developed to protect any pharmaceutical company, doctor, or medical association from any “fault.”
It’s not about pointing fingers, many people really do believe that every vaccine is fine to inject into somebody. Instead of suing the vaccine manufacturer directly, parents have to undergo complex legal proceedings, asking the government
to admit that the vaccine was responsible for their child’s injury and asking for compensation for the child’s care. Pharmaceutical companies are exempt from participating in these proceedings, and tax payers are the ones who pay for all
the vaccine-related damages, of which there have been many. Below is a great video explaining the process in detail. You can learn more about that here. Again, ask yourself – why are so many laws, mandates, and programs put in place to completely protect pharmaceutical companies from any wrongdoing whatsoever? Think about that for a moment. Sources:
http://www.burgsimpson.com/pdf/AbarayKernArticle.pdf http://apps.americanbar.org/litigation/committees/products/articles/summer2013-0713-inside-learned-intermediary-doctrine.html https://mckinneylaw.iu.edu/ilr/pdf/vol40p397.pdf
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2964337/ http://nsnbc.me/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/BSEM-2011.pdf
5 Dangerous Chemicals in Conventional Sunscreens
By Dr. Edward F. Group Guest Writer for Wake
Up World Your skin is the largest organ of your body, yet few people realize its importance for their health. While keeping your heart, liver, and kidneys functioning properly is crucial, so is protecting your skin from radiation and harsh environmental
contaminants and conditions. Now, you’re probably already thinking about sunscreen, the leading product in this regard, which helps to protect the outer layer of your skin from the damaging effects of UV radiation. Conventional sunscreen, however, contains a number of chemical ingredients that may actually be harmful to your health. Dangerous Chemicals
in Sunscreens The overall reason I recommend organic sunscreen is because of the chemicals contained in conventional sunscreen. Most sunscreens sold today are chemical concoctions that have been linked to a number of health maladies. Here’s
a list of the 5 common chemicals found in non-organic sunscreens and their health effects. Upon seeing the plethora of negative health consequences associated with non-organic sunscreen, you’ll see why I only recommend organic varieties. 1. Avobenzone
Avobenzone is a primary agent in commercial sunscreens due to its effectiveness in absorbing a wide range of ultraviolet (UV) rays, specifically the type that is known to cause sunburn. It’s been considered a relatively safe chemical, but recent research
suggests otherwise. Avobenzone degrades in the sun, resulting in the release offree radicals that may actually
increase the risk for cancer. [1] [2] Free radicals are also known to accelerate skin aging and research has also tied it to a slew ofallergies. [3] 2. Fragrance Sunscreen is often injected with a variety of artificial fragrances as a means of making the product more appealing and tolerable to the senses. The list of aroma-producing chemicals used for
this purpose is enormous — over 1,500 — and you’ll rarely see the actual chemical name of a fragrance on a label, as many chemicals are grouped together under the umbrella term “artificial fragrance.” Cancer, nervous system
disorders, allergies, and birth defects are some of the shocking concerns that have been linked to artificial fragrance. [4] It shouldn’t be surprising that an increasing number of public places are now banning their use. 3. Oxybenzone
Oxybenzone and avobenzone function in similar ways, and both are found in the majority of commercial sunscreens. While they do absorb the sun’s rays so they don’t penetrate the skin, they are actually more toxic than avobenzone. This chemical
may actually be behind the increased rates of melanoma, the skin cancer that most people are attempting to avoid by using sunscreen! Oxybenzone has been found to lower the birth weight of girls whose mothers’ bodies had high exposure levels. It’s
also linked to allergies, hormone disruption, and cell damage.
[5] [6] [7] 4. Parabens Parabens are commonly used as preservatives in sunscreen as well as a variety of personal care and beauty products. There are 18 different varieties, and you can easily spot them on most labels because they all contain
the word “paraben” in their chemical nomenclature. What makes them dangerous is that they’re estrogen disruptors. Parabens have been associated with infertility, abnormal development of the testes, obesity, asthma, allergies, benign tumors of the uterus or digestive tract, and breast cancer. [8] 5. Vitamin A Considering that it is a necessary nutrient, it might seem surprising to see vitamin A listed as a concern.
The shocking truth is that when vitamin A — often in the form of retinyl palmitate — is exposed to UV light, it creates free radicals that may cause genetic mutations that actually increase cancer risk. The Solution: Organic and Chemical
Free Why would anyone who knows of the health risks posed by non-organic sunscreens ever use them? They pose incredible health risks, possibly contributing to the very disease they’re
supposed to protect against. The only sane way to protect yourself from the sun’s harmful effects is by using an organic sun protection product that’s made from natural materials, with no chemicals or other dangerous substances. Please
do yourself and your skin a favor by slathering only organic products on your body, for the health of your skin. Do you wear sunscreen? Do you have a preferred organic brand? Let us know in the comments! - Dr. Edward F. Group III, DC, ND, DACBN,
DCBCN, DABFM References: - Earth Working Group (EWG). Avobenzone. EWG. Fact Sheet.
- Karlsson I, Hillerström
L, Stenfeldt AL, Mårtensson J, Börje A. Photodegradation of dibenzoylmethanes: potential cause of photocontact allergy to sunscreens. Chemical Research in Toxicology.
November 2009. doi: 10.1021/tx900284e.
- Kockler J, Robertson S, Oelgemöller M, Davies M, Bowden B, Brittain HG, Glass BD. Butyl methoxy dibenzoylmethane. Profiles
Drug Subst Excip Relat Methodol. 2013;38:87:87-111. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-407691-4.00003-4.
- Earth Working Group (EWG). Oxybenzone. EWG. Fact
Sheet.
- do Nascimento DF, Silva AC, Mansur CR, Presgrave Rde F, Alves EN, Silva RS, Ricci-Júnior E, de Freitas ZM, dos Santos EP. Characterization and evaluation
of poly(epsilon-caprolactone) nanoparticles containing 2-ethylhexyl-p-methoxycinnamate, octocrylene, and benzophenone-3 in anti-solar preparations. Journal of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology. September 2012. PMID: 23035447.
- Cameron
GJ Hayden, Michael S Roberts, Heather AE Benson. Systemic absorption of sunscreen after topical application. The Lancet. September 2, 1997. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(05)62032-6.
- Earth Working Group (EWG). Browsing 18 ingredients (parabens). EWG. Fact Sheet.
- Crinnion WJ. Toxic effects of the easily avoidable phthalates and parabens. Alternative
Medicine Review. September 15, 2010. PMID: 21155623.
- Earth Working Group (EWG). Retinyl Palmitate (Vitamin A Palmitate). EWG.
Fact Sheet.
Previous articles by Dr. Group: About the author:
Dr. Edward F. Group III (DC, ND, DACBN, DCBCN, DABFM) founded Global
Healing Center in 1998 and is currently the Chief Executive Officer. Heading up the research and development team, Dr. Group assumes a hands-on approach in producing new and advanced degenerative disease products and information. Dr. Group
has studied natural healing methods for over 20 years and now teaches individuals and practitioners all around the world. He no longer sees patients but solely concentrates on spreading the word of health and wellness to the global community. Under his leadership,
Global Healing Center, Inc. has earned recognition as one of the largest alternative, natural and organic health resources on the internet.
Trace Amounts: The Documentary The CDC Doesn’t Want You To See
http://www.collective-evolution.com/2015/02/19/trace-amounts-the-documentary-the-cdc-doesnt-want-you-to-see/
Mercury Toxicity: Has it caused one
of the worst health crises in American history? During the past two decades, the diagnosis of autism occurring in children
has risen dramatically from 1 in 10,000 to 1 in 68 and our scientific community is no closer to determining a cause. But one thing they automatically do is emphatically deny a possible link between autism cases and something found in
our vaccines. Trace Amounts see
trailer here: is a riveting new documentary being released worldwide on April, 1st 2015. It’s the true story of Eric Gladen’s painful journey through mercury poisoning that he believes resulted from a thimerosal-loaded tetanus
shot. At the age of 29, he became diagnosed as an adult with autism-like symptoms. His experience spurred him on an urgent quest for the truth about the role of mercury poisoning in the Autism epidemic. While the medical and scientific community -who
follow direct orders from the CDC -pointblank refuses to admit that there is a link between mercury toxicity and autism -this film exposes some very incriminating evidence that they are actually very aware of its ability to trigger
autism. Many scientific studies have proven that mercury toxicity can cause the exact same symptoms as autism -so you can bet the CDC simply
does not want you to see this film. With billions of dollars at stake -and a reputation built on the public’s trust -the CDC can’t afford to have you find out what is happening. The
Film Eric and the film’s other director, Shiloh Levine, traveled around the USA interviewing scientists, reporters, doctors, and various experts about Thimeresol in our vaccines. Eric specifically wanted to know: was his thimeresol-loaded
Tetanus vaccine the sole cause of his massive decline in health? After receiving the vaccine back in 2004 Eric’s physical and mental health quickly went into a terrible downward spiral; he realized he was incredibly sensitive to noise and
to light, he hallucinated and had trouble sleeping. He also could not keep still, was shaking regularly and he became extremely anxious. Eric had gone from being a healthy, fully functioning adult, to an adult with symptoms like that of autism. Howcould
this happen? Could it be the exact same concern many parents also have? That the thimeresol in the vaccines was the main cause of their children’s decline in health?
What
Trace Amounts Exposes This 94 minute film leaves you absolutely reeling with the undeniable evidence behind the dangers of thimeresol and the deliberate cover-up of it’s toxic effects which were discovered
early on by many scientists. Whilst I urge you to see it for yourself, I have highlighted some of the main issues it covers: - Thimeresol’s dark history
- Why it was removed from pet vaccines, but
not removed from human vaccines
- Eli Lilly’s ‘safety study’ of thimeresol – 22 people with meningitis had injections of thimeresol; 22 died most within a day of receiving the injection; despite this, Eli Lilly concluded that
thimeresol had a ‘very low toxicity for humans’
- Mercury is the second most toxic substance to humans, second to plutonium
- EPA states that 2 ppb is the maximum safe level for drinking water; 200 ppb found in water (e.g. a
lake or swimming pool) would be classified as hazardous waste; in most vaccines containing thimeresol there is an amount of 50,000 ppb.
- Despite CDC saying mercury has been removed from vaccines, thimeresol is still found
in flu, meningitis andtetanus vaccines
- Most vaccines for third-world countries still contain thimeresol
- The synergistic toxicity with mercury- and
aluminium-containing vaccines is exponentially more harmful to humans
- Thimeresol was studied back in the 1940’s for it’s efficiency as an antibacterial preservative – it was proven to be poor and neurotoxic –
Eli Lilly were told of about this, but did nothing
- Other studies showed that mice were killed when injected with vaccines containing thimeresol; Eli Lilly did nothing
- Thimeresol does not need
to be used in single vaccines, only in the multi-dose shots
- Dr. Andrew Wakefield in his Lancet study only ever hinted at a link and suggested the use
of single vaccines till further evidence was made conclusive; many studies from around the world have now replicated and proven his theory
- The Homeland Security Act was secretly brought in to protect Eli Lilly and other
vaccine companies from beingsued for any problems related to thimeresol or any other ingredients found in vaccinations
- Autism can be successfully treated with chelation therapy,
nutritional supplements, and dietary changes, often leading to the diagnosis eventually being “removed”
The Experts Interviewed in Trace Amounts - Paul Offit, MD
- Dan Burton – Retired Congressman
- Dan Olmstead – Reporter
- Andrew Cutler – PhD Scientist
- Brian Hooker – Researcher & Bioengineer
- Professor Boyd Haley
- Sander Greenland – Professor of Epidemiology
- Dr. Mark Geier – Physician and Researcher
- David Kirby Investigative Journalist
- Dr.
Frank B Engley PhD Scientific Researcher
CDC Chief Admits That Vaccines Trigger Autism A Collective Evolution Call To Action: What Can We Do We can
bring about change through spreading awareness about this film. Trace Amounts is currently touring around the USA, please view the ‘join us’ film above and then click
here to find out if it comes near your town. You can arrange a screening with friends and family. In the wake of the CDC Whistleblower case, and the subsequent mainstream media blackout, many people agree: Trace Amounts could not have come at a better time. www.traceamounts.com
Further Reading:
The producers of this film have put up some awesome videos and links to many of the studies mentioned which will enable you to take a further
look into this controversial issue and decide for yourself: is thimeresol causing autism? Thimerosal Safety data History of Thimerosal Scientific Papers on Mercury More about Thimeresol Are You Or Your Family Suffering From Mercury Toxicity? A non-invasive oral swab test can be done in the privacy of your own home with the toxyscreen.com mercury and lead test. This painless test is taken from inside the mouth and behind the lower lip. It’s so gentle it can be done while a child is sleeping -causing far less stress for you and your infant than
that of a blood test. While Trace Amounts is mainly concerned with mercury poisoning, many heavy metals are causing unprecedented health problems in humans and, most concerningly, our children. Take a look at the full profile test that also screens for levels of cadmium and arsenic. Synergistic toxicity is a huge health problem.
600 Reasons Turmeric (gurkemeie) May Be The World’s Most Important Herb
http://wakeup-world.com/2013/07/26/600-reasons-turmeric-may-be-the-worlds-most-important-herb/
By Sayer Ji Contributing Writer for Wake Up World There is a medicinal spice so timelessly
interwoven with the origins of human culture and metabolism, so thoroughly supported by modern scientific inquiry, as to be unparalleled in its proven value to human health and well-being. Indeed, turmeric turns the entire drug-based
medical model on its head. Instead of causing far more side effects than therapeutic ones, as is the case for most patented pharmaceutical medications, turmeric possesses hundreds of potential side benefits, having been empirically demonstrated
to positively modulate over 160 different physiological pathways in the mammalian body. While no food or herb is right for everyone, and everything has the potential for unintended, adverse side effects, turmeric is truly unique in its exceptionally
high margin of safety vis-à-vis the drugs it has been compared with, e.g. hydrocortisone, ibuprofen, chemotherapy agents. Furthermore, nothing within the modern-day pharmaceutical armamentarium comes even remotely close to turmeric’s 6,000 year track record of safe use in Ayurvedic
medicine.[1] Despite its vast potential for alleviating human suffering, turmeric will likely never receive the FDA stamp of approval, due to its lack of exclusivity, patentability and therefore profitability. Truth be told, the FDA’s “gold
standard” for proving the value of a prospective medicinal substance betrays the age old aphorism: “he who owns the gold makes the rules,” and unless an investor is willing to risk losing the 800+ million dollars that must be spent upfront,
the FDA-required multi-phased double-blind, randomized clinical trials will not occur. For additional details on this rather seedy arrangement, read my previous article on the topic: Why The Law Forbids The Medicinal Use of Natural Substances. At GreenMedInfo.com, we have reviewed over 5,000
study abstracts from the National Library of Medicine’s bibliographic database known as MEDLINE and have discovered over 600 potential health benefits of turmeric,
and/or its primary polyphenol known as curcumin. These can be viewed on GreenMedInfo’s turmeric research page which
is dedicated to disseminating the research on the topic to a larger audience. Some of the most amazing demonstrated properties include: Again, what is so amazing is not
that turmeric may have value in dozens of health conditions simultaneously, or that it may improve conditions that are completely resistant to conventional treatment, but that there are over six hundred additional health conditions it
may also be valuable in preventing and/or treating. Consider also the fact that turmeric grows freely on the Earth, and you will understand why its very existence threatens billions of dollars in pharmaceutical industry revenue. Learn more about this
research in the video below – keeping in mind that it is several years old and needing some updating – and please spread the information to others who may benefit from learning more on the topic. Source: [1] The Genus Curcuma (Medicinal
and Aromatic Plants – Industrial Profiles); CRC; March 2007 Further articles by Sayer Ji About the author:
Sayer Ji is the founder and director of www.GreenMedInfo.com and
an advisory board member at the National Health Federation, an international nonprofit, consumer-education, health-freedom organization.
He co-authored the book Cancer Killers: The Cause Is The Cure, and is currently co-authoring another book with Tania Melkonian entitled EATomology: An Edible Philosophy of Food. Check out Sayer Ji’s new collaborative project EATomology.
Join Wake Up World's Ever Evolving Social Communities Facebook Pinterest
Google Plus Twitter
Please help support the evolution of WuW by shopping through our international Amazon
links and receive up to 70% off on selected products. USA- Canada - France - Germany - UK
Earthing, The Benefits Of Connecting With Earth’s Energy
http://www.collective-evolution.com/2013/01/17/next-time-you-go-out-remember-to-forget-your-shoes/ Have you ever been
barefoot at a park or on the beach, and just felt right? Just felt at home, connected in some form or fashion with the natural world? It’s a feeling that is so innately human, yet is forgotten so quickly upon returning the doldrums and monotony of the
shoe-wearing concrete ridden western world. Have you ever wondered where this connection, this oneness, is coming from? You aren’t just some loony hippie spouting sounds about being one with mother earth (okay, maybe you are), there is actual evidence
for this phenomenon! I found an article on the benefits of going barefoot, and after you hear some of this information you are going to find every excuse in the world to leave your shoes at home! As we all know, in the West it is a seemingly vital part of
life to wear shoes to be respected and successful, however did you know that only 20% of the world’s population wears shoes? It’s true. It may be winter now, but spring is just around the corner, and some of these benefits will surprise you!
1. Clear Your Mind It’s hard not to pay attention to every step when you’re walking barefoot. You have to be on the look out for sharp rocks
and thorns. Awareness of what’s in front of you in this moment quiets your inner chatter and clears your mind and helps you focus on the here and now. As we all have been hearing a lot lately I’m sure, being we are in the midst of an awakening,
living in the moment is a key component to happiness and health for the mind, body and spirit! If you haven’t heard this, but would like to know more, just contact me and we can talk! 2. It’s Free Foot Yoga Walking
barefoot strengthens and stretches the muscles, tendons and ligaments in your feet, ankles and calves. This helps prevent injury, knee strain and back problems. Not only that, but because it works muscles not used when you’re wearing shoes, it strengthens
and stretches your core, helping keep your posture upright, and your balance spot on. 3. It’s a Free Reflexology Session. There are reflex points to every part of your body in your feet. Every little bump and rock in the
road helps to stimulate all these little reflex points. If it hurts at first – especially in specific areas, this means your feet need the stimulation they’re getting by being barefoot. Over time, these sensitivities will go away, and the areas
the tenderness corresponds to will be rejuvenated, helping decrease the symptoms of whatever it is that ails you. 4. Decrease Anxiety & Depression. Walking barefoot in the grass can help decrease anxiety and depression by
62 percent, and increases the levels of those feel good endorphins. Awesome! 5. Get a Good Night’s Sleep. The ancients believed that walking barefoot in the grass was the best cure for insomnia, and many people still swear
by it today. 6. It’s Grounding. Literally. The human body is made up of about 60% water, meaning we are excellent conductors for electricity. The earth naturally has a negative ionic charge. Negative Ions have been proven
to detoxify, calm, reduce inflammation, synchronize your internal clocks, hormonal cycles and physiological rhythms. Additionally, negative ions neutralize pollutants! Going barefoot on our wonderful planet earth grounds our bodies to that charge. The best
places to get some negative ions through your feet are by the water. This means that the ideal location to be barefoot and receive maximum benefits would be the beach! However, you can still reap the benefits from just walking on the grass in your backyard,
so don’t fret if you do not live near a beach! 7. Get Back to What Matters. To be barefoot outside doesn’t just involve your feet – the rest of you has to be outside too. You get to connect with Mother Nature
all around. Feel the sunshine on your face; hear the wind in the trees. It’s easier to connect to a higher power when you’re in touch with Nature; it’s easier to put things into perspective. How To Earthing can
be done by simply walking barefoot and/or sitting outside on the lawn, dirt, or sand. Earthing should be done for at least 60 minutes every day for optimal benefits. Of course, you can do this as much as you like and even little bits is helpful if you aren’t
able to do for 60 minutes. A few more thoughts on the reasons why we need to walk barefoot and tap into the primal energy of the Earth - Inflammation has been linked to nearly every degenerative disease you can think of — cardiovascular
disease, diabetes, arthritis, glaucoma, autoimmune disorders, cancer and many more. Earthing reduces chronic inflammation and related chronic pain.
- Earthing neutralizes the free radicals in our bodies, significantly reducing oxidative stress and readily
recovers us from injuries, trauma and exhaustion.
- Earthing recommended for anyone with an auto-immune condition
- Grounding affects your DNA immediately
- When you ground to the electron-enriched earth, an improved balance of the sympathetic
and parasympathetic nervous system occurs.
- Enhances circulation, leading to more energy
- The Earth is the natural antidote for electron deficiency to achieve a healthy balance.
- Improved sleep
- Reduces hormonal and menstrual
symptoms
Who knew something as simple as a barefoot walk could be so good for you – mind, body and soul.
TARMBAKTERIER STYRER VÅR ADFERD OG HELSE
POSTED BY FRIPRESSE ON MAY 28, 2013 IN HELSE |
Betent og irritabel tarm settes i sammenheng med en lang rekke lidelser – deriblant ME, autisme, fibromyalgi, angst, depresjon og fedme. Tarmen vår huser mange milliarder mikroorganismer.
Nå har forskere funnet at disse bakteriene styrer våre følelser, adferd og helse. Forskere ved McMaster universitet avdekket nylig at tarmens mikroorganismer styrer hjernekjemien vår. Funnene er oppsiktsvekkende fordi man fra tidligere
er kjente ved at tilstander som irritabel tarm ofte er assosiert med angst og depresjon. I forsøk på mus ble det gjort interessante oppdagelser. Det ble konstantert endringer i det nevrokjemiske stoffet BDNF etter manipulasjon av
dyrenes tarmflora. Når passive mus uten tarmflora ble kolonisert med tarmbakterier fra aktive mus ble deres adferd endret i tilsvarende retning. Forskningen kan vise vei for terapeutisk effekt av probiotika...mer: http://fripresse.com/2013/05/28/tarmbakterier-styrer-var-adferd-og-helse/
Farmasøytisk industri - Kommer den til å falle når sannheten avdekkes ?
http://www.naturalnews.com/Big_Pharma.html 1/13/2013 - Greedily clawing for new ways to generate as much profit as logistically possible, the pharmaceutical industry has taken a renewed interest in developing novel drugs
for so-called "orphan" diseases, or extremely rare health conditions that affect only a miniscule percentage of the overall population....
Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/Big_Pharma.html#ixzz2TNqpaaNY
12/12/2012 - Even
while manufacturers of nutritional supplements remain effectively gagged when it comes to promoting the truthful health benefits of their own products, a recent federal appeals court decision appears to give a free pass to pharmaceutical representatives peddling
prescription drugs for "off-label"...
Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/Big_Pharma.html#ixzz2TNr8lcB6 11/6/2012 - As our nation continues to consume disease-causing, highly processed, genetically modified foods loaded with trans-fats, sodium and sugar, the
health consequences become more prevalent and harder to ignore. For the pharmaceutical industry though, this couldn't be better news. The ill heath of our country...
Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/Big_Pharma.html#ixzz2TNrFdPLJ
10/28/2012 - Before the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)
approves a new drug, pharmaceutical companies have to demonstrate through drug trials on humans that their drugs are, supposedly, safe. Unfortunately, many of these tested-on-human-guinea-pigs medications turn out to have serious side effects that aren't...
Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/Big_Pharma.html#ixzz2TNrMGdzs
- Publisert onsdag 30. november -0001 00:00
- Skrevet av Britt Hansen
- Treff: 10
Denne informasjonen kommer fra: NaturalNews.com i USA: Genmodifisert mais viser seg å inneholde praktisk talt ingen næringsstoffer men er full av
kjemisk gift! Bakenfor ligger Monsantos påstand om "substantial equivalence" mellom GMO og ikke-GMO mais, og deres rosenrøde løfter om å redde verden fra ernæringskrise. Monsanto hevder at godtatt genmodifisert
mais er markant like god som ikke-GMO, noe som da betyr at GMO-mais ikke er næringsstoffmessig forskjellig fra ikke-GMO-mais. Men disse studiene viser at dette er direkte feil, og indikerer at Monsanto er engasjert i en global svindel.
Hvor relevant er dette i Norge? Norge er som kjent politisk imot GMO. Og folket har sagt klart fra om at de ikke vil ha det! Fritt Helsevalg ringte Direktoratet for Naturforvaltning
for å forsikre seg om at ingen mais-type nylig er blitt godkjent. De forsikret oss om at Miljødepartementet ikke godkjente en genmodifisert mais Bt11 x GA21 til dyrefor i desember 2012 på deres anbefaling. Fritt
Helsevalg gjennomførte i desember/januar 2013 en undersøkelse blant sine medlemmer, og svaret var et rungende: NEI til genmodifiert mat! Les hele artikkelen og studiene her. De er på engelsk:
http://www.westonaprice.org/modern-foods/how-to-avoid-gmos
http://www.momsacrossamerica.com
http://www.gmwatch.org Vi vedlegger en link til AVAAZ som har for tiden satt igang en underskriftskampanje i protest mot Monsanto. Følg linken
hvis du vil vite mer: http://www.avaaz.org/en/monsanto_vs_mother_earth_x/?bvHzQbb&v=23931
Derfor fyller de E-stoffer i fisken din
Blant forbrukere kan E-stoffer ha en negativ klang, selv om bokstaven E i utgangspunktet bare betyr at stoffene er EU-godkjent. Og noen fiskeprodusenter fyller opp fisken sin med forskjellige E-stoffer, uten at du som forbruker oppdager
det før du leser ingredienslisten nøye. Dette viser Forbrukerinspektørene i sin sending i kveld. Bades i fosfat Polar Seafood Norway selger blant annet fiskesorten Pangasius med E-451 og E-452 i ingredienslisten. Daglig leder i Polar
Seafood Norway, Trygve Åsvedstad, selger Pangasius importert fra Vietnam. Foto: Stephan Reis /NRK Stoffene E-451 og E-452 er fosfater. Når fosfat blandes i et vannbad, så vil fisk som legges i et slik
bad trekke til seg prosessvann....mer: http://www.nrk.no/helse-forbruk-og-livsstil/1.10989545
“You Put What In My Mouth?”
Support the film that shows exposing millions to mercury vapor thousands of times higher than safety limits is NOT harmless. We did it ! Thank
you to all of you who contributed ! Your generous pledges have enabled us to meet our Kickstarter fundraising goal ! Not only will we have the financial resources to finish the film, but your REWARDS are now guaranteed!..-mer: http://www.kickstarter.com/projects/mercuryexposure/you-put-what-in-my-mouth
Interview med Atle Johan Løvaas om alternativ medicin og sundhed
Drikkevann og innvirkning på helse
En av verdens største undersøkelser av helse og drikkevann er foretatt i Norge. (Flaten,1991) Resultatene fra denne tyder på at drikkevannet innvirker vesentlig mer på helsen enn myndighetene informerer om. Klarest
var sammenhengen mellom svovel fra sur nedbør og hudkreft. Likevel fokuseres det kun på drikkevann og helse når bakterier og parasitter gir akutte mageproblemer....mer: http://www.sykavhuset.no/drikkevann.htm
Monsanto Explained: What's Happening & How You Can Stop It
GMO
If you're just starting to learn about GMOs, you might not know quite where to begin. These links provide an introduction to the issues, players and politics of the GMO controversy. Once you're a little more familiar with the issues, you cansearch
the site or visit the yearly archives to find additional information.....mer: http://www.saynotogmos.org/
Vet du dette om margarin?
Skrevet 11/12/2011 av Astrid Gunnar Lindgren holder et foredrag om hvordan margarin fremstilles og hvilke kjemikalier som benyttes i fremstillingen. Vil du spise Vita «Hjertego» etter du har lest dette? Her er en liten oppsummering av hans foredrag. “Sannheten om margarin” – Gunnar Lindgren Hva er bakgrunn for utvikling av margarin/kunstig smør? I Frankrike utlyste de en konkurranse om hvordan man kunne lage et kunstig smør. Da hadde
de ikke mange kjemiske muligheter til å lage kunstig smør, det ble litt animalsk fett i margarinet på starten. Men nå har de større kjemiske muligheter til å tilvirke dette. Det gjør at tilvirkningen av vegetabilske
oljer og margarin er veldig usunn. Ideen om margarin strider mot ønsket om å lage sunn mat. For å lage margarin tar de bort smaker/næringsstoffer fra det naturlige fettet, for å få en slags «nøytral»
olje. De bruker fettmolekyler som er frarøvet naturlig innhold. Fettindustrien som blant annet lager margarin – og som lager en såkalt «ren»/renset olje – bruker fettet på ulike måter; til malefarger, smøremiddel,
legemidler, margariner og kosmetikk. Den nøytrale oljen tilsettes farge for å se ut som smør. Det tilsettes også kunstige/syntetiske smaksstoffer. Hele ideen med margarin er bakvendt – lages med kunstige kjemikalier. Oljen
som brukes i margarin fraktes faktisk i samme tanker som kjemikalier og bensin! Fett ved margarinfremstilling behandles blant annet med ekstraksjonsbensin, fosforsyre, lut, blekemiddel, nikkelkatalysator, løsningsmidler fra fraksjonering, bensin, nikkelrester
og metanol. Som konsumenter har vi egentlig rett til å vite hva som er i maten, samt produksjonsmetoder. Men vi får ikke vite alt. Myndighetene går dermed imot sin egen lovgivning for dette. Lovgivningen sier egentlig at forbruker
skal få vite alt om hva mat inneholder og hvordan den er fremstilt. Produksjonsprosessen: Oljeraffinering – pressing og ekstraksjon. Da får man et lager av råolje. Dette varmpresses på 100-120 grader (kaldpressede
oljer er mye sunnere). Så legges det i bensin, og bensinen skiller ut mer olje og deretter renses det igjen. Likevel er det igjen rester av bensin i oljen. Så blekes det og hydreres (gjør fast fett til flytende umettet fett, og oljens smeltepunkt
forandres). Det fraksjoneres (skiller mettet fett fra umettet fett) og deodoriseres, slik at det klargjøres for bruk i margariner. Umettet fett er flytende – fast fett er mettet. Rapsoljefett kan ikke bli fast i margarinen, da har man isåfall
herdet fettet. Vegetabilsk fett er flytende umettet. Animalsk fett er fast og mettet. Margarinindustrien har demonisert meieriprodusentene fordi de bruker mettet fett. I fraksjoneringsprosessen brukes det aceton (som også brukes i neglelakkfjerner).
Når man gjør flytende fett til fast, så dannes transfett. Transfett er helsefarlig, og brukes ikke så mye lenger men finnes i enkelte produkter. Kan gi høyere LDL, lavere HDL, overvekt ,diabetes osv. Natriumetylat
brukes: fettet er i et stort kar, natriumetylat tilsettes. Det endrer fettmolekylene, alle fettsyrene blandes og hopper tilbake til helt nye sammensetninger enn det var. Det eneste man får til da er at margarinet likner på smør i konsistensen.
Det blir ikke kornete, men blir en fin konsistens på en kunstig måte. Fremstillingen er et brudd mot en biologisk norm. Blodprøver fra navlestrenger hos barn viser at man finner ulike miljøgifter, legemiddelrester osv. Det
er så mange av dem at de kan skape helseproblemer (allergier, ADHD, dysleksi osv). Stoffene har negative hormonelle effekter. F.eks. kan gutter få for mye østrogener osv. Det finnes E-stoffer i margarin, men også prosesskjemikalier
(nikkel, bensin osv). Prosesskjemikalier er det ikke påbudt å angi på innholdsfortegnelsen. Dette bør industrien merke, for kundenes skyld; hvilke stoffer margarinet har vært i kontakt med. Aceton kan f.eks. brukes til å
fjerne spesielle smaker i te, f.eks. bitre smaker, slik at det smaker «bedre». Løsningsmidler kan også ta bort koffeinet i kaffe. I tillegg til E-stoffer bør man få vite hvilken mat bensin er brukt i. Soya; soyabønner
males, blandes ut i varmt vann og bensin, en prosess som skiller ut fett og soyalecitin slik at det flyter opp og f.eks. proteiner forsvinner. Soyaolje inneholder alltid større eller mindre bensinrester. Butanol, hexan, propanol, osv. brukes
som kjemikalier i fremstilling av mat og margarin. Ca. 1mg/kg ferdig produkt er tillatt brukt av hver av disse stoffene. Konklusjon: spis ren, hel og naturlig mat; smør! Bremykt og Meierismør! Margarin vs smør
Oppdatert Informasjon om Farene ved Mobilstråling
- Publisert lørdag 09. februar 2013 22:43
- Skrevet av Britt Hansen
- Treff: 153
ANH (Alliance for Natural Health - anh-europe.org), Fritt Helsevalgs engelske, affilierte organisasjon, har publisert denne artikkelen som vi videreformidler: En ny rapport fra: The
BioInitiative Working Group 2012 sier at bevisene for helserisiko fra elektromagnetisk felt og trådløse teknologier (radiofrekvent stråling) har økt betydelig siden 2007. Rapporten er blitt laget av 29 fagfolk fra 10 land og
går igjennom mer enn 1800 nye vitenskapelige studier: Mobilbrukere, gravide kvinner og små barn er spesielt utsatt for risiko! Her er linken til rapporten: http://anh-europe.org/sites/default/files/130116_Bioinititive_Report2012_Key_Public_Health_Recommendations.pdf
HVA KAN DU GJØRE? - ANH har igangsatt en kampanje som du kan være med å underskrive og eventuelt sende videre! http://www.anh-europe.org/campaigns/electro-magnetic-radiation-emr
- Bruk mest mulig ledningsnett, unngå mest mulig trådløs nettverk! - Og husk: Spis mest mulig en sunn naturdiett full av antioksidanter, vitaminer og mineraler! - Sov 7-8 timer i et mørkt rom for melatonin-frigjørelse.
- Ta pauser fra EMF-miljøet.
From "Don't Think Like a Human", Book Two
You will see some medicines and mechanicals
coming your way which are very special. Let me inform you about them. New age medicines will be those medicines which contain life, life that is either currently alive or has been. Here is where the "bias" of the healing comes in.
Intent is everything, and is the catalyst for many things. This is not new information, for it has been channeled for you before. Even as you SPIN, intent is necessary for you to create balance or healing. Now I will tell you that as you administer
the new medicines, YOU MUST GREET THEM. There must be intent. There must be responsibility.
None of the new medicines which truly contain three dimensional science will work without this. You must greet them and love
them. If you stand idly by, fearful of them, hoping they will work - letting them enter your body, letting them take over something you should be participating in - they will simply lie dormant. You must greet them (for them to work at all).
Some of the things I will tell you here will sound silly and unscientific. The truth remains the truth, whatever you choose to believe.
~ KRYON, through Lee
Carroll
Bromerte flammehemmere
Bromerte flammehemmere er betegnelsen på en gruppe organiske stoffer. Alle de omkring 70 ulike stoffene inneholder brom som er brannhemmende. Bromerte flammehemmere kan ha alvorlige effekter
både for helse- og miljø. 1. Tilstand Stoffene påvist mange steder i miljøet og i mennesker Bromerte flammehemmere
har blitt påvist i blodprøver fra den norske befolkningen siden 1980-tallet. I studier fra 2005, 2006 og 2007 er lave konsentrasjoner påvist i blodprøver fra gravide kvinner i Bodø og Russland. I følge Folkehelseinstituttet
økte nivået av bromerte flammehemmere i norsk morsmelk betraktelig fra 1986 til 2001. Undersøkelser fra 2005 tyder på at nivåene synker noe.......mer: http://www.miljostatus.no/Tema/Kjemikalier/Noen-farlige-kjemikalier/Bromerte-flammehemmere/
Dioxin i maten
Dioxin Ongoing dioxin scandal in Germany [1] The high levels of dioxins that have
shown up in small amounts of German produce have been traced to a single fats manufacturer, Harles and Jentzsch. Another feed producer based in Damme/Germany has now been traced more than 15 days the begin of investigations. The company had tried to conceal
his connections with Harles Jentzsch. Now, about 900 farms have to be closed and wait for dioxin tests. Dioxin source Hans Schenkel, a professor of agricultural chemistry of the University of Stuttgart,
said the pattern of dioxins in the fat were similar to dioxins found in kaolin which might be involved in the latest food poisoning. Kaolin can be used up to 3% in animal feed to improve the flow during pumping when moving the animal feed from one store to
another and caused a dioxin scandal in 1999. Kaolin is also used to sort out spoiled potatoes and potatoes unsuitable for French fries. The speculations of professor Schenkel were dissipated by investigations of the officials of Münster/Germany.......mer:
http://www.ourfood.com/Dioxin.html
Ikke bare mennesker som sliter med dårlig drikkevann
Elgen på Sørlandet har betydelig dårligere helse enn den som holder til
lenger nord og på Østlandet. Sørlandselgen sliter med både nyretrøbbel og beinskjørhet. Synnøve RessemJournalist, NTNU Onsdag 20. oktober 2010 kl. 05:00 Det er først og fremst reproduksjon og slaktevekt som avslører
at sørlandselgen er i sørgelig dårlig form. Årsaken kan være sammensatt......mer: http://www.forskning.no/artikler/2010/oktober/268051
|
|
|
|
|
|